IBE 2
22 flashcards · Other · by Daniel F.
Measure of IIT
Grubel-Lloyd index: 1 - |EX-IM| / EX+IM Amount of EX and IM are the same: GL = 1 Only EX or only IM: GL = 0
Imperfect competition
Firms influence price of procuts falling average cost of production => economies of scale
Sources of scale of economies
Internal External
Internal sources of scale
Average costs fall in the firm’s own scale of production more internal scale economies the more oligopoly there is Reasons: up front costs, equipment produces in large numbers
External economies of scale
average costs fall in the industry/region of all firms as output increases average costs are lower in larger industries/regions Explains clustering of firms (Hollywood, Silicon Valley) Reasons: Large supply of specialized services, labor, Knowledge spillovers
Monopoly
AC = (MC*Q+F)/Q Profit = MR*Q - MC*Q - F
Why we need imperfect competition
classical trade implies perfect competition trade is driven by differences in comparative advantages countries should import and export different products similar countries should not trade with one another in reality there is trade between similar countries countries import and export similar products To get here we need to deviate from perfect competition product differentiation and monopolies oligopolies firm clustering
Intra-Industry trade
Growing with increase of demand for product variety Trade within industries/product categories: Export and import products that are close substitutes Driven by product differentiation, comparative advantages, seasonal fluctuation Net trade: absolute difference between EX and IM (|EX – IM|). IIT: EX + IM – |EX – IM|
Models with imperfect competition
Monopoly Monopolistic competition each firm produces one unique product, but competes with other firms that offer similar products Oligopoly Firm clustering
Monopolistic competition under autarky
Characteristics Products are unique but are strong substitutes and analyzed together easy entry and exit Firms are encouraged to join market demand is reduced, profits decline as long as there is profit to be made new firms join under equilibrium there are no profits
Monopolistic competition with trade
Production and price More competition decreases D and MR More variety makes D (and MR) more price elastic (flat) Result: lower price, lower profit, some firms exit until all firms make 0 profit
Number of varieties in monopolistic competition
Gains from trade in monopolistic competition
Free trade benefits consumers in two ways: Lower product prices. More varieties Little/no impact on producer surplus sales at home is compensated by gain of sales abroad Due to fiercer competition from trade, inefficient firms go out of business Average firm productivity increase
Trade restriction in monopoly - Tariff
Trade restriction in monopoly - Quota
Net welfare losses are bigger under the quota than the tariff
Oligopoly
very few large firms actions provoke strategic counteractions models two firms two actions
The oligopoly coordination problem
firms are in a prisoners dilemma cooperating would yield higher profit if they do collude there is incentive to break away if price is higher there is more profit and better terms of trade
When is collusion easy/difficult
Model of external scale economies
large number of small firms (zero profit) the average costs of production of all firms in an industry and region fall as the industry in this region expands
external scale economies and trade
trade expands the industry lowering AC Producers in exporting benefit Producers in importing lose Consumers win on lower prices
firm clustering
certain locations experience lasting production advantages potentially lower-cost locations, cannot easily overcome the scale advantages of the established location
Grubel-Lloyd index