Modelling and Simulation in Health Technology Assessment (TU Wien, Austria)
47 flashcards · Other · by Locke Lamora
COVID-Model Overview
Population Contacts Disease Policies
GEPOC + Properties
Generic can handle any problem regarding country population Population depicts population Concept consists of several models Properties: Microscopic model Standard model without interaction, but capable of it Considers births, deaths, immigration and emigration Discrete-time
COVID-Model: Contact Module
Based on POLYMOD developed for influenza modelling Contacts between agents are at locations (households, schools, workplaces,...) Based on mobile phone data
COVID-Model: Disease Module
Attributes: infected (true/false) virus strain confirmed (true/false) disease severity Considers immunity (to different strains)
COVID-Model: Policy Module
Time-line of events as input (closing of locations, reduction of contacts,...) Based on other modules
Atlases (sic!)
Epidemiologie Atlas Which diseases does the population suffer from Versorgungsatlas Which services are available where and when Leistungsatlas Which services are provided regionally
Epidemiology in Austria
Hardly any data on ICD diagnoses Data for prescriptions available Idea: Build model that estimates diagnoses from prescribed medications
COVID-Model: Influencing Factors
Measures Vaccination Screenings Treatments Immunization Seasonality Mutation
COVID-Model: Validation
Validate by run simulate past and check with actual data
Simulation Circle
3 Properties that define a Model
Mapping Reduction Prapmatism
Two Steps of Abstraction
Structural Abstraction (Qualitative Knowledge) Phenomenological Abstraction (Quantitative Knowledge)
Iterative Modelling
For every iteration perform whole modelling process and update problem entity, the concept and the model
Modelling Methods
Structural Challenges in Austria Health Care System
HTA definition
HTA refers to systematic evaluation of effects, properties, impacts and consequences of health technologies
PICO
Population Intervention Treatment (on patient or on system level) Prevention (diagnostics, vaccination,...) Control (Status Quo or Gold standard) Outcome
Open/Closed Population
Closed: Single birth cohort Men at age 18+ at reference date whole population of country at reference date,... Open: All people with age 2: Enter and leave population as they get older Men at age 18+: Enter and never leave
Outcomes of HTA
Incidence, Prevalence Deaths QUALYs Costs ICER PYLL (Potential Years of Life Lost)
DEEPP
Describe System Evaluate consequences of strategy/technology Explore new strategies Predict Persuade decision maker
Specificity
Specificity=TNTN+FPSpecificity = \frac{TN}{TN+FP}Specificity=TN+FPTN
Sensitivity
Sensitivity=TPTP+FNSensitivity = \frac{TP}{TP + FN}Sensitivity=TP+FNTP
SPIN and SNOUT
Specificity rules in: positive test with high specificity makes likely that person has condition Sensitivity rules out: negative test with high sensitivity makes likely person does not have condition
HTA Domains
▪ Health Problem and Current Use of the Technology ▪ Description and technical characteristics of technology ▪ Safety ▪ Clinical Effectiveness ▪ Costs and economic evaluation ▪ Ethical analysis ▪ Organizational aspects ▪ Social aspects ▪ Legal aspects
Quality of Evidence
Used to rate literature High (very confident) Moderate (likely to be close to estimate) Low (may be substantially different) Very low (likely to be substantially different)
Information Resources
Effectiveness
How well a treatment works when applied in real world
Efficacy
How well a treatment works in experiments in clinical studies
Equity
Costs, responsibility (ethics), safety,...
Efficiency
Cost-benifit, profitability
ICER
Incremental Cost Effectiveness Ratio ICER=cost intervention A−cost intervention Beffect intervention A−effect intervention BICER = \frac{cost~intervention~A-cost~intervention~B}{effect~intervention~A-effect~intervention~B}ICER=effect intervention A−effect intervention Bcost intervention A−cost intervention B
QALYs
Quality-adjusted Life years W=L⋅QW= L\cdot QW=L⋅Q LLL ... extended life time QQQ ... grade of life quality (0-1)
Purpose of Modelling
Modelling Approaches (Table)
Modelling Approaches - Summary
There is no single modelling approach which suffices all possible research questions. The most accurate method sometimes is not the best method as the value of information gained from a superior model often does not justify additional time and ressources Development of the model requires expertize frommany different fields in a highly interdisciplinary process Parameterization is very complex task as data and information from various sources has to be intertwined according to the research quest…
Markov Process
A stochastic process with the Markov Property is called Markov Process A Markov Chain is a Markov Process with a discrete time-space and a fininte event space.
Markov Property
This means the process is memoryless!
State Properties
stationary distribution: distribution of states always stays the same as the in the initial distribtuion absorbing states: state that cannot be left if once entered Recurrent states: revisited infinitely many times Transient states: visited only a finite number of times and then never again
Components of CA
Cells States State Space Cell-Space Neighbourhood Update Rule
HPP-FHP CA Difference
Agent Definition
With respect to Winter Simulation Conference (2005 & 2006) an agent has to... ... be uniquely identifiable ... cohabitate an environment with other agents, and has to be able to communicate with them. ... be able to act targeted. ... be autonomous and independent. ... be able to change its behaviour.
Properties of Agent based Models
Representation of „emergent phenomena“ Simple rules for individual agents -> complex dynamics of the whole system Flexibility: change of details very easy Natural description of the system system components look like in realtiy no mathematical knowledge needed to understand
Two classes of agent-based models
ABMs for qualitative investigation • (On purpose) very abstract • Usually very complex model behaviour • Hardly any parameters identified with real data ABMs for quantitative investigation • Rather simple agent interactions • lots of data for model parametrisation and validation • Usually less famous
Pros and cons agent-based models
Good in: ...analysis and discovery of complex group dynamic behaviour. This must not necessarily be a good thing as emergent behaviour may occur in models even if it is not correct ...communitcating models to non-experts. The modelling appoach is easy to understand, picturesque and no mathematical background is necessary. Agent-based modelling is problematic … … regards misinterpretation. If it looks like reality it must not necessarily be a valid model for it. … regards the validation process.…
System Dynamic Modelling Process
Stock and Flow Diagrams
Components: Stocks: state variables of the System (snapshot test) Flows: only way of changing stocks inflows and outflows depend on system state Parameters Sources/Sinks Stocks outside system borders Auxiliary Variables can be easily calculated from model
Types of Delays
Material Delay: Pipeline Delay: Material exits delay exactly after delay time First Order Exponential Delay: Material in transit is perfectly mixed, it exits with an average delay time Information Delay: Acquiring information takes time First-order Exponential Smoothing: Output adapts gradually to input